| Citation: | WU W,LIN Z Y,WANG X L. Evolutionary game of subsidy strategy on multi-airport route network under homogeneous competition[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(10):3392-3404 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0477 |
To enhance the high-quality collaborative development of multiple airports in the region based on differentiated positioning, the impact of airport subsidy strategies on the evolution of the multi-airport route network was studied, and the optimal subsidy strategy was determined. A double-layer evolutionary game model was constructed based on the competitive game relationships among passengers, airlines, and airports. In the upper-level model, the influence of passengers’ self-learning ability on fares was considered, and a passenger Logit choice model incorporating a self-learning mechanism was constructed. The Hotelling model was then used to analyze the impact of fare competition among airlines on the same route on passenger choice behavior, thereby determining the optimal pricing strategy for airlines under competitive conditions. In the lower-level model, the evolutionary game process of competitive choices between airport subsidies and airlines was analyzed based on the replicator dynamic equation. The synergistic effect of the inter-airport collaborative subsidy strategy and the route network was determined.The results show that for airlines transferring routes, the advantageous discount range for attracting leakage passengers is between 0.6 and 0.75. The fare discounts for airlines competing on the same route should be concentrated between 0.6 and 0.85 to avoid the loss of revenue caused by low price competition. Additionally, the optimization of the route network through airport subsidies reveals that each airport has an optimal subsidy range based on its functional positioning.
| [1] |
SU M, LUAN W X, YUAN L Y, et al. Sustainability development of high-speed rail and airline: understanding passengers’ preferences: a case study of the Beijing–Shanghai corridor[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(5): 1352. doi: 10.3390/su11051352
|
| [2] |
TERAJI Y, MORIMOTO Y. Price competition of airports and its effect on the airline network[J]. Economics of Transportation, 2014, 3(1): 45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2014.03.001
|
| [3] |
DOBRUSZKES F, GIVONI M, VOWLES T. Hello major airports, goodbye regional airports? recent changes in European and US low-cost airline airport choice[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2017, 59: 50-62.
|
| [4] |
周蔷, 王忠群, 龚本刚. 基于航线网络的定价、超售与舱位控制策略研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(1): 126-134.
ZHOU Q, WANG Z Q, GONG B G. Strategy research on the pricing, overbooking and cabin inventory control of airline network[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 52(1): 126-134(in Chinese).
|
| [5] |
PENG I C, LU H A. Coopetition effects among global airline alliances for selected Asian airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2022, 101: 102193. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102193
|
| [6] |
骆嘉琪, 匡海波, 冯涛, 等. 基于两阶段博弈模型的高铁民航竞合关系研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(1): 150-164. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788-2018-0154-15
LUO J Q, KUANG H B, FENG T, et al. Research on the co-opetition between high speed rail and civil aviation based on two stage game model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(1): 150-164(in Chinese). doi: 10.12011/1000-6788-2018-0154-15
|
| [7] |
KIM A M, RYERSON M S. A long drive: Interregional airport passenger “leakage” in the U. S[J]. Tourism Management, 2018, 65: 237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.012
|
| [8] |
LIAO W, CAO X S, LI S C. Competition and sustainability development of a multi-airport region: a case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(10): 2958. doi: 10.3390/su11102958
|
| [9] |
卞骞, 宋丽英, 毛保华, 等. 基于市场进入博弈的高速铁路与航空竞争分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 20-27.
BIAN Q, SONG L Y, MAO B H, et al. High speed rail and air transport competition: a market-entry game approach[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(5): 20-27(in Chinese).
|
| [10] |
YANG C W, LU J L, HSU C Y. Modeling joint airport and route choice behavior for international and metropolitan airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014, 39: 89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.05.001
|
| [11] |
MINATO N, MORIMOTO R. Designing the commercial sustainability of unprofitable regional airports using system dynamics analysis[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2011, 1(1): 80-90.
|
| [12] |
HOU M, WANG K, YANG H J. Hub airport slot re-allocation and subsidy policy to speed up air traffic recovery amid COVID-19 pandemic-case on the Chinese airline market[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2021, 93: 102047. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102047
|
| [13] |
陈欣, 张珍, 邱瑞, 等. 基于动态博弈的补贴模式对机场群航线网络结构的影响研究[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 59(5): 201-207.
CHEN X, ZHANG Z, QIU R, et al. Research on the impact of subsidization on the airline networks of multi-airport systems based on dynamic game theory[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 59(5): 201-207(in Chinese).
|
| [14] |
张珍. 基于博弈论的机场群管理模式和航线网络选择策略研究[D]. 南京: 南京财经大学, 2023.
ZHANG Z. Research on airport group management mode and route network selection strategy based on game theory[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, 2023(in Chinese).
|
| [15] |
魏夕凯, 马本. 农村生活垃圾分类治理的奖惩激励机制: 基于复杂网络演化博弈模型[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(8): 3822-3831. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.08.040
WEI X K, MA B. Reward and punishment incentive mechanism of domestic waste classification in rural China: based on complex network evolutionary game model[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022, 42(8): 3822-3831(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.08.040
|