Volume 51 Issue 10
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Y,MENG B H,YE C,et al. Comparison and evaluation of data correction methods for directional polarimetric cameras[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(10):3307-3312 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0527
Citation: WANG Y,MENG B H,YE C,et al. Comparison and evaluation of data correction methods for directional polarimetric cameras[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(10):3307-3312 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0527

Comparison and evaluation of data correction methods for directional polarimetric cameras

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0527
Funds:

K.C.Wong Education Foundation “International Team of Advanced Polarization Remote Sensing Technology and Applications” (GJTD-2018-15)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:bhmeng@aifom.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 17 Aug 2023
  • Accepted Date: 13 Oct 2023
  • Available Online: 17 Oct 2025
  • Publish Date: 17 Nov 2023
  • The data correction process of a directional polarimetric camera (DPC) primarily includes two components: background correction and frame transfer effect correction. The image acquisition process of the photodetector is a random sampling procedure, and mathematical processing methods are applied to the sampling results during data correction, which introduces noise. This paper mainly discussed the influence of dark background correction and frame transfer effect correction on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) during DPC data processing. Modeling and simulation of the SNR for two frame transfer effect correction methods were conducted. Validation was performed using actual data from the DPC onboard an atmospheric monitoring satellite. The results demonstrate that both background correction and frame transfer effect correction increase noise, thus reducing the SNR. Background correction should involve more than five background data sets. Compared to the two frame transfer effect correction methods, the sum of column ratio method outperforms the dark row method, achieving a maximum increase in SNR of 15.8.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ANGAL A, XIONG X X, SUN J Q, et al. On-orbit noise characterization of MODIS reflective solar bands[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2015, 9: 094092. doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.9.094092
    [2]
    TWEDT K A, LEI N, XIONG X J. On-orbit noise characterization of the SNPP VIIRS reflective solar bands[C]//Proceedings of the Earth Observing Systems XXII. Bellingham: SPIE, 2017.
    [3]
    董浩, 刘振海, 赵鑫鑫, 等. 环境减灾二号卫星偏振扫描大气校正仪在轨信噪比评估[J]. 光学学报, 2022, 42(24): 2401005. doi: 10.3788/AOS202242.2401005

    DONG H, LIU Z H, ZHAO X X, et al. On-orbit SNR evaluation of polarized scanning atmospheric corrector onboard HJ-2 satellites[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 2401005(in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/AOS202242.2401005
    [4]
    高连如, 张兵, 张霞, 等. 基于局部标准差的遥感图像噪声评估方法研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2007, 11(2): 201-208. doi: 10.11834/jrs.20070227

    GAO L R, ZHANG B, ZHANG X, et al. Study on the method for estimating the noise in remote sensing images based on local standard deviations[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2007, 11(2): 201-208(in Chinese). doi: 10.11834/jrs.20070227
    [5]
    CHAPPELL A, SEAQUIST J W, EKLUNDH L. Improving the estimation of noise from noaa avhrr ndvi for Africa using geostatistics[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001, 22(6): 1067-1080. doi: 10.1080/01431160120633
    [6]
    DELVIT J M, LEGER D, ROQUES S, et al. Signal-to-noise ratio assessment from nonspecific views[C]//Proceedings of the Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing VII. Bellingham: SPIE, 2002.
    [7]
    FOUGNIE B, BRACCO G, LAFRANCE B, et al. PARASOL in-flight calibration and performance[J]. Applied Optics, 2007, 46(22): 5435-5451. doi: 10.1364/AO.46.005435
    [8]
    涂碧海. 大气气溶胶多角度偏振成像仪数据校正及检验方法研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2020: 29-85.

    TU B H. Research on data correction and inspection method of atmospheric aerosol multi-angle polarization imager[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2020: 29-85(in Chinese).
    [9]
    李扬, 骆冬根, 孙亮, 等. 帧转移型面阵CCD相机拖尾评价标准和校正方法[J]. 光子学报, 2022, 51(4): 0404001. doi: 10.3788/gzxb20225104.0404001

    LI Y, LUO D G, SUN L, et al. Evaluation criteria and correction method of frame transfer CCD camera smearing[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(4): 0404001(in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/gzxb20225104.0404001
    [10]
    翁建文, 袁银麟, 郑小兵, 等. 星载偏振相机帧转移模糊效应校正方法研究[J]. 光学学报, 2019, 39(12): 1228005. doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.1228005

    WENG J W, YUAN Y L, ZHENG X B, et al. Correction method for frame-transfer blurring effect of spaceborne polarization camera[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1228005(in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.1228005
    [11]
    European Machine Vision Association. Implementation of EMVA 1288 standard release 4.0 for characterization of image sensors [EB/OL].(2021-06-16)[2023-08-04].http://www.emva.org/wp-content/uploads/EMVA1288Linear_4.0Release.pdf.
    [12]
    曹金彦, 贺小军, 陈茂胜, 等. 航天TDICCD相机谱间串扰分析与处理[J]. 半导体光电, 2024, 45(6): 953-959.

    CAO J Y, HE X J, CHEN M S, et al. Spectral crosstalk analysis and processing for aerospace TDICCD camera[J] Semiconductor Optoelectronics, 2024, 45(6): 953-959(in Chinese).
    [13]
    关怡然, 李新, 张权, 等. 高光谱紫外辐照度仪CCD电路系统的设计及测试[J]. 量子电子学报, 2024, 41(2): 246-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.02.007

    GUAN Y R, LI X, ZHANG Q, et al. Design and test of CCD circuit system of hyperspectral UV irradiance monitor[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(2): 246-256(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.02.007
    [14]
    黄辉, 熊健, 刘祥, 等. 基于图像信噪比的PSP图像平均幅数确定方法[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2023, 31(12): 237-243.

    HUANG H, XIONG J, LIU X, et al. PSP image average number determination method based on image signal-to-noise ratio[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2023, 31(12): 237-243(in Chinese).
    [15]
    朱树旺, 赵开春. 分焦平面偏振图像传感器信噪比标定[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2023, 31(7): 1012-1021. doi: 10.37188/OPE.20233107.1012

    ZHU S W, ZHAO K C. Calibration of signal-to-noise ratio of sub focal plane polarization image sensors[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31(7): 1012-1021(in Chinese). doi: 10.37188/OPE.20233107.1012
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(29) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return